Friday, April 26, 2013
syaiful
Happy audience ladies and gentlemen.
Team line:
Our time line is the corruptor has human right to live and government can use jail sentence.
Team split:
The first speaker speak about the human right for the corruptor to live, the second speaker talk about the chance for corruptor to back go the right way, and the third speaker speak about the worst effect caused by death penalty.
Arguments:
I disagree with the motion because there are some reasons why I disagree about it! It can be regarded from various kind of field.
1. Regarded from human right.
2. Regarded from psychology of corruptor family.
Ladies and gentlemen.
Here as the first speaker I will speak about human right. I think we all know what human right is. Human right is right that adhere in everyone’s self since inside of womb that’s have a supreme and fundamental as the gift of God for long life and it can’t be claimed by whoever and it must be respected, be kept and must be protected by whoever social or state. From the statement above it is really obvious that everybody, everyone has a human right especially life right including for the corruptor. Corruptor is also an ordinary human. Like me, like you, and like us. So, corruptor has human right to life as well, why corruptor should get a death penalty ladies and gentlemen?
Based on constitution of 1945 article 28 a about life right. It is really obvious that it is contain about human right.
So, relating to this if the death penalty really be done. Won’t it break human right? Where is the real of our government to protect the society if the death penalty really be done?
Ladies and gentlemen.
We recognize that Indonesia is even the house of corruptors. Many corruptors in Indonesia started by the most little levels up to highest levels. But, I think to give penalty our government must not use a death penalty. Actually, the corruptors are mostly smart person and have an outstanding education.
But, because of their intelligence is not be balanced by strong religion lesson. So that, finally they are taken to do a corruption.
And if all of them get a death penalty what will happen to our country? Perhaps, citizen or resident in Indonesia is only a stupid person as the rest?
If we wait the next generation it is not sure will be better than the corruptor right now.
Ladies and gentlemen.
Now, let’s see the reality! We all know that manycorruptors in Indonesia who has known or have not yet. Maybe the corruptor in Indonesia has reached 50% of official in our country and all of them get a case of corruption.
Please you imagine; if all of them get a death penalty. How about their family fate? Perhaps they will be misery or maybe their family will be poor because they do not have a spinal column to fulfill their needs. Will it increase the level of poverty in our country? They will cry all night long who will take responsibilities to them? Our government? I think it is not possible right?
Ladies and gentlemen.
Like what I say in my previous statement that actually the corruptor mostly a smart people. If death penalty really be done it will reduce the intelligence our government.
So, relating to this I think a death penalty is not really important. Instead of giving death penalty it is better if our government improve things for development our country. And instead of their behavior maybe, perhaps our government can give the corruptors a penalty as heavy as the lost that is caused of them.
And it is not necessary get a death penalty.
So, here we are as the opposition we disagree with the motion. Thanks
Rebuttal:
Ladies and gentlemen happy audience.
Here is my rebuttal. Based on the arguments given by government, it does not have any correlation between the death sentences with the fear of perpetrating corruption. Again, we said it does not have any correlation at all. We should focus on the people who accused as the corruptors and they get death penalty.That is the point of this debate actually. It seems the government does not really understand with the motion.
Arguments:
I am sure you all know about mafia of law court.Alleged people will look for the way to escape and manipulate the result of court. We arevery sorry, somehow we do not intend to put aside the dignity of judiciary but some irresponsible people who abuse their power of legalized government to do that.This clearly shows that the tribunal of law court is still likely to be unfair for some cases.
Ladies and gentlemen.
We, therefore, stand against this motion because government has possibility to fine the corruptor with prison sentence. It aims at giving the corruptor the chance to reconstruct their life into the way of goodness. The way that they and their family can live happily without any feeling of being ashamed and blamed by all people in the country. Thus it is the main purpose of fining the corruptor with the jail sentence and not with the death penalty that criticized and cursed by International Amnesty Commission demanding all nations to not use the death sentence.
Ladies and gentlemen.
The next argument that we should pay more is that there are many people blamed because of the others’ crime. The bad people envy with the good people. So, they try to manipulate some cases for the good that possibly cause them jailed into prison. We should understand that not all government officials corrupt the money and put it into their own pocket. They do good job without any tendency and honestly manage the financial administration in advance, but sadly, they are cursedly slandered by their fellow perpetrating corruption. That is definitely because the reason on how the bad tackling the good and succeed the good’s position.
That is why we should convince you all that this motion is clearly understood and tackling the problem properly. We greatly against this motion ladies and gentlemen. Thanks
Rebuttal:
Ladies and gentlemen. The debate is going to the end and we are as the opposition, will give rebuttal for the last speaker of government. Here we go. Let’s think critically with this motion ladies and gentlemen! The case of corruption is criminal but it is the same with the others. You know why? That because corruption is the case of morality. If we can lead to morality into the goodness so it transforms people from the hell to the heaven. And the government should give the chance for corruptor to do that. Death penalty cannot be used to do that but prison sentence has the possibility to change corruptor realizing their mistake.
Point of arguments from the first and second speaker.
1. Regarding human right, corruptor should have chance to change their behavior become the good people.
2. Regarding mafia of law court, alleged corruptor has possibility that someone is envy with them and manipulates cases for them.
Ladies and gentlemen.
This motion is clearly understood that we should give chance for the corruptor to be the good people.
However, if the sentence has been executed and the last was found that the alleged corruptor does not perpetrate, how is the responsibility for the corruptor and the family. They lose forever and no one can make them live again ladies and gentlemen.
Therefore, that can cause the revenge from the family. Who knows? They will do crime that is worse than corruption ladies and gentlemen.
So, corruption is the matter of morality and we should change it step by step with prison sentence.
We are as the opposition, firmly disagree with the motion.
Thank you ladies and gentlemen.
